Compare and Contrast Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement | Retour

The Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement are two international treaties aimed at tackling climate change. Both agreements have been signed by numerous countries around the world, and although they share similar goals, there are some notable differences between the two.

The Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1997 and went into effect in 2005. It was designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in industrialized countries by 5% from their 1990 levels by 2012. The agreement also established a market-based system where countries could trade carbon credits, allowing some countries to exceed their emissions targets if they purchased credits from other countries that had lowered their emissions below their targets.

On the other hand, the Paris Agreement was signed in 2015 and aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. It also seeks to pursue efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius. Unlike the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement is not legally binding, but it does require countries to submit plans for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions and report on their progress every five years.

One of the biggest differences between the two agreements is their approach to emissions reduction targets. The Kyoto Protocol targets were based on a country`s level of development and were mandatory, while the Paris Agreement allows countries to set their own targets and does not require them to follow a specific formula. This approach is based on the idea that countries will be more willing to participate if they can set their own goals rather than being forced to meet mandatory targets.

Another difference between the agreements is the inclusion of developing countries. The Kyoto Protocol only applied to industrialized countries, while the Paris Agreement includes commitments from both developed and developing countries. The developed countries are expected to provide financial and technological support to the developing countries to help them meet their emissions reduction targets.

Both the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement have been criticized for various reasons. Some argue that the Kyoto Protocol did not go far enough in reducing emissions, while others believe that the Paris Agreement is too weak and not ambitious enough to tackle climate change. Despite these criticisms, both agreements represent important steps towards global cooperation to address climate change and promote sustainable development.

In conclusion, while the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement share a common goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, there are significant differences in their approach and implementation. The Kyoto Protocol had mandatory targets for industrialized countries and included a market-based approach to emissions reduction, while the Paris Agreement allows countries to set their own targets and focuses on global cooperation to achieve its goals. Regardless of their differences, both agreements represent important steps towards addressing the complex issue of climate change and promoting a sustainable future.